2017 Part 2: What’s next?
In my last post, I talked about some of the reasons why I’ve
become frustrated with my work in ELT publishing and started to
question where I want to go next. In this post, I want to share some of the
thoughts that have been floating around my head, in no particular order, about
what I can do to change that.
One of the first questions I’ve had to face is whether I
still enjoy working in ELT at all. And you’ll be pleased to hear that the
answer is essentially yes. When I’m not getting frustrated dealing with fees
and schedules and restrictive briefs, and it’s just me and a Word document and
a load of language, then yes, I still love it. What’s not to love about playing
with words for a living? The task ahead, then, seems to be one of picking the
right projects or as Tania Pattison put it in her recent blog post, taking on
projects that “fit with your vision of yourself as a writer” … which is perhaps
easier said than done!
Having started off as a lexicographer, I’m still at my
happiest using a corpus to tease out how language works. I really could happily
spend all my time investigating how words fit together; making lists of collocations
and phrases and colligations and dependent prepositions and explaining all the
subtle and quirky differences between them. That should equate to writing vocab
materials, but having done a lot of that in recent years, I know it’s not
always as satisfying as I’d like. The briefs for many vocab projects involve a
pre-determined syllabus and format, and an infuriating reliance on wordlists
which take no account of chunks and phrases and multiple meanings or the
difference between receptive and productive lexis*. And you find yourself being
told that you can’t use a word because it’s ‘above level’ or been ‘covered’
before or … any number of other completely nonsensical reasons why you can’t do
what you know is pedagogically sound.
Which perhaps leads me naturally to think about breaking
away from publishers to go it alone. Several people I’ve spoken to have talked
about self-publishing as an alternative. It does have a certain appeal, but
from what I’ve heard of others’ experiences, self-publishing involves a huge
amount of investment of both time and money, for very little return. You simply
don’t make money from self-published materials. And whilst I’m not only in it for
the money, this is my job and I do need to pay the mortgage. From a practical
point of view, that means either writing something quite small in scope, like
the How to Write EAP Materials title I did for ELT T2W, or stretching work on a
bigger project out over a longer period of time, squeezing in bits and pieces
when I can. I do have a few half-ideas floating around, but nothing fully formed
and ready-to-go just yet.
Another option is to more actively push for the types of
work I enjoy most … again, not always easy. A few of my ‘big breaks’ and
changes of direction have come from proactively pushing. My first book (Common Mistakes at Proficiency) came
about because I was doing corpus research for the series and I summoned up
the courage to ask the editor if they had authors for all the titles. They
hadn’t and she asked if I’d like to write one of them. Other work has come,
either directly or indirectly, from chatting to the right people at
conferences. A huge amount is down to luck and timing, but sometimes going
along to the right events and making your interest in a specific area well
known can help. To this end, I’ve started to nudge myself in a couple of
directions …
Firstly, I’ve realized that one of the things I enjoy most
is messing about with a corpus. Sadly though, it’s something that only rarely
do I get paid to do. So I’ve started to edge my way a bit more into the corpus
linguistics world. Back in October, I went along to a Corpus Linguistics in the South event in Cambridge. Most of the people there were academics talking about
their research, but there are a few other folks who bridge the gap between the
academic and the commercial. I haven’t yet spotted an obvious opportunity for
work beyond what I’ve already been involved in, but I’m enjoying getting back
into the academic side of the discipline and you never know what might crop up.
I’m planning to put a proposal in for at least one corpus linguistics
conference in 2018, so we’ll see where that leads.
Another aim is to get away from my desk a bit more. Most
years, I manage to go to a handful of conferences and events, either as a
participant or a speaker, and I generally come back feeling energised and having
learnt something new, about a different teaching context or a different area of
ELT. Unfortunately, unless I can get
sponsored by a publisher to do a talk on their behalf, the costs come out of my
own pocket, and with lots of conferences expecting speakers to pay a conference
fee as well as their travel expenses, that soon becomes unaffordable. One
option I’d like to explore more though is doing more teacher training. I love
getting to meet and work with teachers from different places and, as well as
being fun, it feeds neatly back into my writing. I recently ran a teacher training workshop in Moscow, which I really enjoyed, and I’ll be looking out
for more similar opportunities in the year ahead.
So I guess that’s a few leads to be getting on with, nothing
radical and no magic bullet solution, but hopefully, a general push into
slightly new directions for 2018.
*I'll be talking about wordlists and their (mis)use in ELT publishing at the IATEFL conference in Brighton in April.
Labels: 2017, corpus research, planning, review, self-publishing, teacher training, wordlists
2 Comments:
I'll join you in thinking about delving a bit into more formalised teacher training, which I really have never done. Workshops and talks here and there, but nothing ever on an actual course. Maybe 2018 is a time to try that. Unfortunately here, my MA doesn't qualify me alone... stupid really.
I'm not quite thinking formal teacher training courses (a la CELTA/DELTA) either, but just a bit more than I've been doing so far. So my Moscow trip was more CPD than teacher training, but a whole day of workshops rather than a single 60-minute type talk/workshop. It was really nice to do something that was more than just a quick overview. I'm thinking a day or a couple of days of CPD workshops in specific areas would be great.
Post a Comment
<< Home